1. Hello,


    New users on the forum won't be able to send PM untill certain criteria are met (you need to have at least 6 posts in any sub forum).

    One more important message - Do not answer to people pretending to be from xnxx team or a member of the staff. If the email is not from forum@xnxx.com or the message on the forum is not from StanleyOG it's not an admin or member of the staff. Please be carefull who you give your information to.


    Best regards,

    StanleyOG.

    Dismiss Notice
  2. Hello,


    You can now get verified on forum.

    The way it's gonna work is that you can send me a PM with a verification picture. The picture has to contain you and forum name on piece of paper or on your body and your username or my username instead of the website name, if you prefer that.

    I need to be able to recognize you in that picture. You need to have some pictures of your self in your gallery so I can compare that picture.

    Please note that verification is completely optional and it won't give you any extra features or access. You will have a check mark (as I have now, if you want to look) and verification will only mean that you are who you say you are.

    You may not use a fake pictures for verification. If you try to verify your account with a fake picture or someone else picture, or just spam me with fake pictures, you will get Banned!

    The pictures that you will send me for verification won't be public


    Best regards,

    StanleyOG.

    Dismiss Notice
  1. daggabuddy

    daggabuddy Porn Star

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2008
    Messages:
    2,579
    FB_IMG_1712990525229.jpg
     
    • Like Like x 1
  2. stumbler

    stumbler Porn Star

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2006
    Messages:
    106,324
    Donald Trump: 'There Has To Be Some Form Of Punishment' For Women Who Get Abortions If They Become Illegal

    March 30, 2016 / 10:59 PM EDT / CBS New York


    NEW YORK (CBSNewYork) -- Republican presidential front-runner Donald Trump believes women who get an abortion should be punished if the procedure ever becomes illegal.

    During an MSNBC town hall, host Chris Matthews asked the presidential hopeful if there should be punishment for women who get abortions if they become outlawed.

    "The answer is there has to be some form of punishment," Trump said, calling abortion a "very serious problem."



    "For the women?" Matthews asked.



    "Yes," Trump responded.


    Matthews asked Trump if women should be jailed.

    "I don't know. That, I don't know," Trump stated, adding that it is a "very complicated position."

    The billionaire, who said he is pro-life, was not able to explain how he would ban abortions as president.


    "You know, you'll go back to a position like they had where people perhaps will go to illegal places," Trump said. "But you have to ban it."


    Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton called it "horrific and telling."


    Democratic presidential candidate Bernie Sanders also issued a tweet calling Trump's remark "shameful."


    New York City Council Speaker Melissa Mark-Viverito called Trump's comments "horrifying."

    "Criminalizing or punishing women for making their own medical decisions is ludicrous and only demonstrates the misogynistic world view the American public has come to expect from Donald Trump," Mark-Viverito said.

    Pro-life leaders also criticized Trump, as CBS2's Tony Aiello reported.

    The pro-life website LifeNews.com quickly called Trump's comment inept, and March for Life said in a statement, "Mr. Trump's comment today is completely out of touch with the pro-life woman… no pro-lifer would ever want to punish a woman who has chosen abortion.


    Even some Trump supporters seemed troubled.

    "I can't believe that you would punish the woman for that," one supporter said. "I wish I could put some tape on his mouth sometimes!"

    CBS News Political Director and "Face the Nation" host John Dickerson said the remark is reflective of a broader issue that some critics have.

    "This also underscores a criticism of him, which is that Donald Trump hasn't thought through the important issues," Dickerson said.

    Trump issued a statement of clarification to CBS News saying the "issue is unclear and should be put back into the states for determination."

    In another statement, Trump said whoever performed the abortion would be held legally responsible, not the woman.

    "If Congress were to pass legislation making abortion illegal and the federal courts upheld this legislation, or any state were permitted to ban abortion under state and federal law, the doctor or any other person performing this illegal act upon a woman would be held legally responsible, not the woman. The woman is a victim in this case as is the life in her womb. My position has not changed - like Ronald Reagan, I am pro-life with exceptions," Trump said.


    Late Wednesday, New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie defended Trump, whom he has endorsed for president. He said he thinks Trump "misspoke."

    Christie said he was at a Princeton University baseball game at the time the MSNBC interview aired, but he had read a news story that included Trump's subsequent statement. Christie called the statement "perfectly appropriate."

    "I think he's perfectly correct, that if, in fact, there comes a time in this country when states are permitted once again to make abortion illegal, and someone were to perform an abortion, the person to be held responsible for that is the physician who performs the abortion, and not a woman who, quite frankly in my view – and I agree with him on this – is a victim there, as is the child in her womb," Christie said.

    Radio host Eric Scott noted that Trump had initially said there should be some kind of punishment for women who have abortions.

    "I think he misspoke," Christie said in response. "He obviously misspoke. He put out a statement."

    Trump currently leads his Republican rivals with 737 delegates. Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, is second at 460. But a new poll has Trump down 10 points to Cruz in next week's primary.


    https://www.cbsnews.com/newyork/news/donald-trump-abortions/
     
    1. shootersa
      8 years ago ........
      disfuckingmissed

      <iframe width="660" height="371" src="" title="How Biden&#39;s Stance On Abortion Has Evolved Over 50 Years" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" referrerpolicy="strict-origin-when-cross-origin" allowfullscreen></iframe>
       
      Last edited: Apr 14, 2024
      shootersa, Apr 14, 2024
  3. stumbler

    stumbler Porn Star

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2006
    Messages:
    106,324
    'Nobody is killing babies': Fox News host rips right-wing reporter on 'infanticide' myth

    David Edwards
    April 14, 2024 12:56PM ET



    [​IMG]
    Fox News/screen grab




    Fox News host Howard Kurtz pushed back against National Review reporter Caroline Downey after she suggested Democrats were killing babies with their abortion policies.

    During a Sunday panel discussion on Fox News, Kurtz told Downey that Democrats were using Arizona's near-total abortion ban as an example of "what you get when you leave it up to the states."

    "A court can step in and revive this 1864 law where you can get up to five years in prison if you're a provider," Kurtz explained.

    "I mean, look, [Donald] Trump recognized that these states can hold referendums, they can undo some of these restrictions if they want," Downey replied. "But this is the problem with the GOP messaging on abortion."



    "It's not effective counterattacks because what Trump said in his statement was the extremism of the Democrats is astounding and it's not marketed enough, the fact that they could support abortion up until the moment of birth and verges on infanticide," she asserted.

    "Well, the infanticide thing is a bit of a Republican talking point," Kurtz interrupted. "Nobody is killing babies that have already been born."

    "But there's extremism on the other side too, Howie," Downey insisted.

    https://www.rawstory.com/infanticide-fox-news/
     
    Last edited: Apr 14, 2024
  4. shootersa

    shootersa Frisky Feline

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2010
    Messages:
    85,834
    Oh.
    Well good.
    Then we can all agree that late term abortions can be banned.

    See? We're making progress.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  5. stumbler

    stumbler Porn Star

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2006
    Messages:
    106,324
    'Earth-shattering': Arizona GOP in full-on panic 'seismic' ruling will cost them election

    Adam Nichols
    April 10, 2024 9:19AM ET



    [​IMG]
    Abortion rights activists rally in Miami in June 2022 after the US Supreme Court struck down the right to abortion(AFP)




    Republicans are in full-on panic mode amid fears that a Civil War-era law is about to bring a near-total abortion ban in Arizona — thus threatening to decimate the GOP’s election chances in a key battleground state.

    Pending appeals, the law will go into effect in the next few weeks. It will put the issue front and center of the November election, and is expected to have a "seismic impact,” the Washington Post reported Wednesday.

    “I’m trying to think of when there was a more stunning political phenomenon injected into an election cycle, and I can’t think of one,” Stan Barnes, a Republican consultant and former member of the state legislature, told the Post. "It’s just a powerful change in the political landscape leading up to the 2024 general election.”

    Republican operative Max Fose said the state Supreme Court’s decision will, “definitely give Biden a leg up going into the election.”

    “If we look at it, it’s like 9 percent of the electorate is Republican swing voters,” he said. “That represents 234,000 people. They just slummed those people over to Biden’s corner.”

    The court on Tuesday ruled an 1864 law that totally bans the procedure apart from instances when it will save the mother’s life was enforceable, despite the fact that it was put on the books before Arizona was even a state.

    ALSO READ: EXCLUSIVE: Congress raids presidential campaign fund in surprise reversal

    Previously, Arizona law allowed abortion up to 15 weeks of pregnancy.

    The decision sent shockwaves throughout the state and the nation. Even Kari Lake, a vocal pro-lifer and the Republican Senate candidate for the state, called for it to be halted — just two years after she supported it.

    It follows Donald Trump’s announcement earlier in the week that abortion legislation should be up to states to decide, and fears that the issue could be a major deciding factor nationally in November’s election.

    Democratic strategist Tony Cani said it’s “going to be catastrophic” for the GOP.

    “This is earth-shattering,” he told the Post. “This is going to create an overwhelming wave of voters who otherwise might not have been enthusiastic about this election, or otherwise might not have voted at all, to go in and vote literally for their lives and for their rights.”



    https://www.rawstory.com/arizona-abortion/
     
  6. stumbler

    stumbler Porn Star

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2006
    Messages:
    106,324
    Treasonous conservative/America Hating/Republican trying to back away from their extremists views on abortion is actually more helpful to the Democrats than if they had just stuck to their guns. For one its all but impossible in this day and age to change your position without getting caught on tape or social media. So they will get busted. And then at the same time it costs them with the anti abortion forces who thought their were on their side.



    GOP Congressional Hopeful Wished Her State Had ‘Eliminated All Abortion’ In 2020
    Jennifer Bendery
    Mon, April 15, 2024 at 4:12 PM MDT·3 min read
    271








    In a newly discovered video, former Rep. leaving the page." data-wf-tooltip-position="bottom" data-wf-reset-every="90">Yvette Herrell (R-N.M.)said in 2020 that she wished her state had banned abortion entirely ― a sharp contrast to her efforts to appear more measured on abortion issues ahead of the November election, when she is hoping to regain her old seat in Congress.

    “I wish we could have eliminated all abortion in the state,” Herrell said during a virtual candidate forum hosted that year by her state’s Republican Party of Valencia County. “I wish we could have gotten even that to go through. But we couldn’t.”

    She was referring to the eight years, from 2011 to 2019, when she was a member of the New Mexico House of Representatives.

    Moments earlier in the forum, Herrell was asked a strange question about whether she would plead guilty to being pro-life, and if yes, what evidence could be used to convict her.

    “I love these questions you guys came up with, but absolutely I would plead guilty, and the evidence would be a solid 100% pro-life voting record,” she replied.

    Here’s a video of the full event, which was originally posted on Facebook by the Republican Party of Valencia County. Herrell’s comments in support of eliminating all abortion in her state begin around the 22:20 mark. These comments have not been previously reported.


    Herrell had represented New Mexico’s 2nd Congressional District for one term. She was defeated in 2022 by Democrat Gabe Vasquez and is running for the seat again. The race between the two is expected to be one of the closest in the country as Democrats try to erase the five-seat edge that Republicans currently have in the House.

    Herrell’s wish to end all abortions in her state shouldn’t be surprising: She has routinelytouted her anti-abortion views on social media and celebrated the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in 2022 to overturn Roe v. Wade. She also co-sponsored the Life at Conception Act in 2021, which sought to redefine “human being” to include “all stages of life, including the moment of fertilization, cloning, or other moment at which an individual member of the human species comes into being.” It made no exceptions for in vitro fertilization (IVF).

    But Herrell, like so many others in her party, is now scrambling to bury a longstanding anti-abortion record. In the nearly two years since Roe v. Wade fell, abortion rights supporters have been channeling their outrage at the ballot box, handing Democrats wins again and again in elections at all levels and prompting Republicans to downplay long-held positions.

    Herrell has cut all references to abortion from her website and campaign materials. Her campaign has emphasized that she believes abortion rights decisions should be left to the states, a stance also recently adopted by former President Donald Trump.

    Her campaign has also emphasized her support for IVF, a stance that doesn’t line up with her support of the Life at Conception Act.

    A Herrell campaign spokesperson did not respond to a request for comment as to whether she still wishes that New Mexico had banned all abortion.

    The Cook Political Report rates this congressional district a “toss-up.”


    https://www.yahoo.com/news/gop-congressional-hopeful-wished-her-221231135.html
     
    1. shootersa
      "Treasonous conservative/America Hating/Republican trying to back away from their extremists views on abortion is actually more helpful to the Democrats than if they had just stuck to their guns. For one its all but impossible in this day and age to change your position without getting caught on tape or social media. So they will get busted. And then at the same time it costs them with the anti abortion forces who thought their were on their side."
      Oh. You mean like joe has flipped and flopped on abortion?
      On immigration?
       
      shootersa, Apr 22, 2024
  7. stumbler

    stumbler Porn Star

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2006
    Messages:
    106,324
    One of the cruelest lies of all has always been that treasonous conservative/America Hating/Republicans care about life. No, that's bullshit. All they really care about is ramming their own personal religious beliefs to everyone else, dictate to women what they can do with their own bodies, and force women to give birth. But as soon as that baby is born they resent any efforts to actually take care of the mother and child or efforts to feed children and lift them out of poverty.

    But now they have gone even further to confront reality. Extreme religious beliefs and medicine are incomparable. So when they put their Sharia Law For Christians into law medical care and women suffer. This is actually worse than it was before Roe v Wade.



    [​IMG]
    Emergency rooms refused to treat pregnant women, leaving one to miscarry in a lobby restroom
    AMANDA SEITZ
    Updated Fri, April 19, 2024 at 8:48 AM MDT·8 min read
    5.9k




    1 / 4
    Emergency Rooms Pregnancy
    Sacred Heart Emergency Center is pictured Friday, March 29, 2024, in Houston. Complaints about pregnant women being turned away from emergency rooms spiked in the months after states began enacting strict abortion laws following the 2022 U.S. Supreme Court decision overturning Roe v. Wade. At Sacred Heart Emergency Center in Houston, front desk staff refused to check-in one woman after her husband asked for help delivering her baby. She miscarried in a restroom toilet in the emergency room lobby while her husband called 911 for help. (AP Photo/David J. Phillip)
    ASSOCIATED PRESS
    WASHINGTON (AP) — One woman miscarried in the lobby restroom of a Texas emergency room as front desk staff refused to admit her. Another woman learned that her fetus had no heartbeat at a Florida hospital, the day after a security guard turned her away from the facility. And in North Carolina, a woman gave birth in a car after an emergency room couldn't offer an ultrasound. The baby later died.

    Complaints that pregnant women were turned away from U.S. emergency rooms spiked in 2022 after the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade, federal documents obtained by The Associated Press reveal.

    The cases raise alarms about the state of emergency pregnancy care in the U.S., especially in states that enacted strict abortion laws and sparked confusion around the treatment doctors can provide.


    “It is shocking, it’s absolutely shocking,” said Amelia Huntsberger, an OB/GYN in Oregon. “It is appalling that someone would show up to an emergency room and not receive care -- this is inconceivable.”

    It's happened despite federal mandates that the women be treated.

    Federal law requires emergency rooms to treat or stabilize patients who are in active labor and provide a medical transfer to another hospital if they don’t have the staff or resources to treat them. Medical facilities must comply with the law if they accept Medicare funding.

    The Supreme Court will hear arguments Wednesday that could weaken those protections. The Biden administration has sued Idaho over its abortion ban, even in medical emergencies, arguing it conflicts with the federal law.

    “No woman should be denied the care she needs,” Jennifer Klein, director of the White House Gender Policy Council, said in a statement. “All patients, including women who are experiencing pregnancy-related emergencies, should have access to emergency medical care required under the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act.”

    PREGNANCY CARE AFTER ROE

    Pregnant patients have “become radioactive to emergency departments” in states with extreme abortion restrictions, said Sara Rosenbaum, a George Washington University health law and policy professor.

    “They are so scared of a pregnant patient, that the emergency medicine staff won’t even look. They just want these people gone," Rosenbaum said.

    Consider what happened to a woman who was nine months pregnant and having contractions when she arrived at the Falls Community Hospital in Marlin, Texas, in July 2022, a week after the Supreme Court’s ruling on abortion. The doctor on duty refused to see her.

    “The physician came to the triage desk and told the patient that we did not have obstetric services or capabilities,” hospital staff told federal investigators during interviews, according to documents. “The nursing staff informed the physician that we could test her for the presence of amniotic fluid. However, the physician adamantly recommended the patient drive to a Waco hospital.”

    Investigators with the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services concluded Falls Community Hospital broke the law.

    Reached by phone, an administrator at the hospital declined to comment on the incident.

    The investigation was one of dozens the AP obtained from a Freedom of Information Act request filed in February 2023 that sought all pregnancy-related EMTALA complaints the previous year. One year after submitting the request, the federal government agreed to release only some complaints and investigative documents filed across just 19 states. The names of patients, doctors and medical staff were redacted from the documents.

    Federal investigators looked into just over a dozen pregnancy-related complaints in those states during the months leading up to the U.S. Supreme Court's pivotal ruling on abortion in 2022. But more than two dozen complaints about emergency pregnancy care were lodged in the months after the decision was unveiled. It is not known how many complaints were filed last year as the records request only asked for 2022 complaints and the information is not publicly available otherwise.

    The documents did not detail what happened to the patient turned away from the Falls Community Hospital.

    'SHE IS BLEEDING A LOT'

    Other pregnancies ended in catastrophe, the documents show.

    At Sacred Heart Emergency Center in Houston, front desk staff refused to check in one woman after her husband asked for help delivering her baby that September. She miscarried in a restroom toilet in the emergency room lobby while her husband called 911 for help.

    “She is bleeding a lot and had a miscarriage,” the husband told first responders in his call, which was transcribed from Spanish in federal documents. “I’m here at the hospital but they told us they can’t help us because we are not their client.”

    Emergency crews, who arrived 20 minutes later and transferred the woman to a hospital, appeared confused over the staff's refusal to help the woman, according to 911 call transcripts.

    One first responder told federal investigators that when a Sacred Heart Emergency Center staffer was asked about the gestational age of the fetus, the staffer replied: “No, we can’t tell you, she is not our patient. That’s why you are here.”

    A manager for Sacred Heart Emergency Center declined to comment. The facility is licensed in Texas as a freestanding emergency room, which means it is not physically connected to a hospital. State law requires those facilities to treat or stabilize patients, a spokeswoman for the Texas Health and Human Services agency said in an email to AP.

    Sacred Heart Emergency’s website says that it no longer accepts Medicare, a change that was made sometime after the woman miscarried, according to publicly available archives of the center's website.

    Meanwhile, the staff at Person Memorial Hospital in Roxboro, North Carolina, told a pregnant woman, who was complaining of stomach pain, that they would not be able to provide her with an ultrasound. The staff failed to tell her how risky it could be for her to depart without being stabilized, according to federal investigators. While en route to another hospital 45 minutes away, the woman gave birth in a car to a baby who did not survive.

    Person Memorial Hospital self-reported the incident. A spokeswoman said the hospital continues to “provide ongoing education for our staff and providers to ensure compliance.”

    In Melbourne, Florida, a security guard at Holmes Regional Medical Center refused to let a pregnant woman into the triage area because she had brought a child with her. When the patient came back the next day, medical staff were unable to locate a fetal heartbeat. The center declined to comment on the case.

    WHAT'S THE PENALTY?

    Emergency rooms are subject to hefty fines when they turn away patients, fail to stabilize them or transfer them to another hospital for treatment. Violations can also put hospitals' Medicare funding at risk.

    But it’s unclear what fines might be imposed on more than a dozen hospitals that the Biden administration says failed to properly treat pregnant patients in 2022.

    It can take years for fines to be levied in these cases. The Health and Human Services agency, which enforces the law, declined to share if the hospitals have been referred to the agency's Office of Inspector General for penalties.

    For Huntsberger, the OB-GYN, EMTALA was one of the few ways she felt protected to treat pregnant patients in Idaho, despite the state's abortion ban. She left Idaho last year to practice in Oregon because of the ban.

    The threat of fines or loss of Medicare funding for violating EMTALA is a big deterrent that keeps hospitals from dumping patients, she said. Many couldn't keep their doors open if they lost Medicare funding.

    She has been waiting to see how HHS penalizes two hospitals in Missouri and Kansas that HHS announced last year it was investigating after a pregnant woman, who was in preterm labor at 17 weeks, was denied an abortion.

    “A lot of these situations are not reported, but even the ones that are — like the cases out of the Midwest — they're investigated but nothing really comes of it,” Huntsberger said. “People are just going to keep providing substandard care or not providing care. The only way that changes is things like this.”

    NEXT UP FOR EMTALA

    President Joe Biden and top U.S. health official Xavier Becerra have both publicly vowed vigilance in enforcing the law.

    Even as states have enacted strict abortion laws, the White House has argued that if hospitals receive Medicare funds they must provide stabilizing care, including abortions.

    In a statement to THE AP, Becerra called it the “nation's bedrock law protecting Americans' right to life- and health-saving emergency medical care.”

    “And doctors, not politicians, should determine what constitutes emergency care," he added.

    Idaho’s law does not allow abortions if a mother's health is at risk. But the state's attorney general has argued that its abortion ban is “consistent” with federal law, which calls for emergency rooms to protect an unborn child in medical emergencies.

    "The Biden administration has no business rewriting federal law to override Idaho’s law and force doctors to perform abortions,” Idaho Attorney General Raúl Labrador said in a statement earlier this year.

    Now, the Supreme Court will weigh in. The case could have implications in other states like Arizona, which is reinstating an 1864 law that bans all abortions, with an exception only if the mother's life is at risk.

    EMTALA was initially introduced decades ago because private hospitals would dump patients on county or state hospitals, often because they didn’t have insurance, said Alexa Kolbi-Molinas of the American Civil Liberties Union.

    Some hospitals also refused to see pregnant women when they did not have an established relationship with physicians on staff. If the court nullifies or weakens those protections, it could result in more hospitals turning away patients without fear of penalty from the federal government, she said.

    “The government knows there’s a problem and is investigating and is doing something about that,” Kolbi-Molinas said. “Without EMTALA, they wouldn’t be able to do that.”


    https://www.yahoo.com/news/emergency-rooms-refused-treat-pregnant-040150594.html
     
  8. sirius1902

    sirius1902 Porn Star

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2020
    Messages:
    3,918
    Well said, because that's all the biden has to campaign on!

    However, here is the hypocrisy amongst your brand of idiots! Make believe that you are supporting women rights by fighting the roe v. wade, while allowing men to take over all of our women's right by changing title IX!

    Screenshot_20240420_064652_X.jpg

    Screenshot_20240420_064925_DuckDuckGo.jpg

    Screenshot_20240420_062443_X.jpg

    Screenshot_20240420_062609_X.jpg
     
  9. Guido71

    Guido71 Porn Star

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2022
    Messages:
    1,114
    What is wrong with u in USA?No good president at all,only old,with dementia signs candidates..Ate you serious?What went wrong there??
     
    1. sirius1902
      It was the democratic movement to convert our country over to socialism for more power & money for the politicians & large corporations. Less power to the people.

      It started years ago with the Clinton's but was really recognized under Obama
       
      sirius1902, Apr 20, 2024
    2. Guido71
      Guys,you have not had a good president,not a good foreign policy in eons.. I wonder what went wrong there,a land with some 300 million people,which used to be a paradigm for technology,advancement and liberty,is now being surpassed and left way behind .... It would be good to rethink not only why you have a bad president, but a bad foreign policy.. I am not saying we are better,Swiss are a hypocratic regime,and Europe is in a political swamp with Ucraine.. But some other things are still better...I think...
       
      Guido71, Apr 20, 2024
  10. stumbler

    stumbler Porn Star

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2006
    Messages:
    106,324



    If it was not for Title IX there would be no women's sports at all.
     
    1. sirius1902
      That is true when Trump signed it but now that biden has revamped it, men will be taking ladies scholarships & stealing ladies rewards! Good job hypocrites!!!!
       
      sirius1902, Apr 20, 2024
    2. stumbler
      You are simply making bullshit up. There are currently 32 transgender women competing in college sports out of 226,212 —.
       
      stumbler, Apr 21, 2024
    3. sirius1902
      It's not about that moron! It's about protecting women's rights!!! NOT co-fucking-ed
       
      sirius1902, Apr 21, 2024
  11. stumbler

    stumbler Porn Star

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2006
    Messages:
    106,324
    These statistics come from 2022 but support for abortion has only gone up since then. I only use it to illustrate what people like Noam are up against.



    Eighty-six percent of Americans of all parties think a pregnant woman should be able to legally have an abortion if she becomes pregnant because of rape or incest, the PORES/SurveyMonkey survey found. That includes 94 % of Democrats, 88 % of independents and 76 % of Republicans.

    https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/20...bortion-exceptions-rape-incest-moth-rcna52237

    These are the kind of extreme views that terrify women and should repulse the vast majority of Americans.



    Kristi Noem: It's a 'tragedy' not to force rape victims to give birth

    David Edwards
    April 21, 2024 10:37AM ET



    [​IMG]
    CBS/screen grab




    South Dakota Gov. Kristi Noem (R), a possible vice presidential candidate, called rape and incest exceptions for abortion a "tragedy."

    While speaking to Dana Bash on CNN Sunday, Noem was asked if she supported her state's law, which does not provide exceptions for rape, much like Arizona's Civil War-era anti-abortion law.

    "Our law today allows an exception to save the life of the mother, but the people in South Dakota will decide what their laws look like," Noem explained.

    "What do you think it should look like?" Bash pressed, but Noem dodged the question, saying she would enforce her state's laws.

    The CNN host pushed again for an answer.

    "Do you think there should be exceptions for rape and incest, for example?" Bash asked.

    ALSO READ: Inside the neo-Nazi hate network grooming children for a race war

    "That's what's different, Dana, is that I've constantly looked, and we rely in South Dakota on the fact that I'm pro-life and we have a law that says that there is an exception for the life of the mother," Noem opined. "And I just don't believe a tragedy should perpetuate another tragedy."

    "I believe in taking care of mothers that are in a crisis situation and that we should be walking alongside them, giving them all the information and the best information they can make before they have to be put in a situation where an abortion is the only option that they have," she added.

    Watch the video below from CNN or at the link.

    https://www.rawstory.com/kristi-noem-abortion-2667829728/
     
  12. sirius1902

    sirius1902 Porn Star

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2020
    Messages:
    3,918
  13. mstrman

    mstrman Porn Star

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2020
    Messages:
    35,374
    • Agree Agree x 1
  14. daggabuddy

    daggabuddy Porn Star

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2008
    Messages:
    2,579
    FB_IMG_1713950270301.jpg
     
    • Like Like x 1
  15. SoRuffSoTuff

    SoRuffSoTuff Amateur

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2023
    Messages:
    60
    Thi
    Sluts should die with the baby they kill I think
     
    1. stumbler
      I think you are a very sick and sadistic person.

      What is a woman hater like you doing on a pron site?
       
      stumbler, Apr 29, 2024
  16. stumbler

    stumbler Porn Star

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2006
    Messages:
    106,324
    I do not think it will matter if they do repeal the Civil War abortion law. Arizona women are smarter than that and know they can't believe a word treasonous conservative/America Hating/Republicans say. So the only safe way to protect themselves is to pass a constitutional amendment protecting their right to abortion. And it looks like that is what they are going to do.


    Abortion in Arizona: Women race against the clock of an archaic law

    Agence France-Presse
    April 28, 2024 8:35AM ET








    Having only just found out she was pregnant, what she had really wanted was time to think, but that was a luxury she felt she could not afford.

    "The laws in Arizona are really dicey right now, so I wasn't sure what would be available to me," said Piper, who wanted to use a pseudonym to discuss her choice about one of the most divisive issues in America.

    Piper, 30, fell pregnant unexpectedly -- her partner told her he had undergone a vasectomy, but he was keen to go through with the pregnancy.

    "I would have liked to hear him out more, but we just didn't have the time to think through it," she told AFP after taking pregnancy-ending pills at a clinic in Phoenix.

    Arizona's abortion laws are in flux.

    In making its ruling this month, the state's Supreme Court said since the 2022 overturning of Roe vs. Wade -- which had guaranteed abortion rights nationwide -- Arizona's own arrangements had to revert to a 160-year-old statute, drafted before it was even a state and when women did not have the right to vote.

    After a national outcry, the state's lower chamber last week passed a bill that would repeal the law -- but only after three moderate Republican lawmakers abandoned the majority to vote with Democrats.

    The initiative will now pass to the Republican-dominated Senate where its passage is far from certain, reflecting the willingness of elected conservatives to defy a popular desire throughout America to keep abortions safe and legal.

    Democratic Senator Eva Burch says her Republican opponents push the threat of severe bans by way of deterrent.

    "It creates a really hostile, inhospitable environment for women where we don't have any assurance that we're going to be able to get the care that we need if something goes wrong," she told AFP.

    The 44-year-old became something of a figurehead for the abortion rights movement in Arizona after revealing on the floor of the Senate the difficulty she encountered securing the procedure when she learned her pregnancy was not viable.

    "I felt like it was really important... for people to see what that looks like in Arizona and what somebody has to go through in order to receive that kind of care."

    - Election issue -

    Abortion looks set to be a key issue when Americans go to the polls in November to elect a president.

    Incumbent Joe Biden hopes to bolster his flaccid poll numbers by blaming challenger Donald Trump for the tightening restrictions.

    In Arizona, voters will likely be asked to decide if they want the right to abortion enshrined in the state's c

    onstitution.

    Democrats hope that will drive turnout in a state where Biden's 2020 margin of victory was just 10,000.

    For Gabrielle Goodrick, head of the Camelback Family Planning clinic, the anxiety that bans are causing throughout the US will be a motivating factor in November.

    "These laws are so extreme that I think it will push people to the polls... to vote for choice and vote for abortion rights and bodily autonomy and reproductive freedom," she said.

    - 'I thought we took care of this' -

    Goodrick's clinic sees between 20 and 30 patients a day, who slip behind anonymous mirrored glass walls into what looks from the outside like a shopping mall.

    Inside, the atmosphere is warm, and the colorful reception area is buzzing with friendliness.

    "I honestly just try to put on as happy as a face as I can and just be as sweet as possible," said receptionist Gelsey Normand.

    "Because regardless of how you feel about getting an abortion, it's still a difficult choice to make."

    Outside the clinic, a small group of people gather regularly to distribute leaflets they hope will dissuade patients from going through with the procedure.

    "I believe that God has a plan and a purpose for every baby he creates," said Lynn Dyer, 88, who has been in the anti-abortion movement for five decades.

    The anti-abortion group frequently attracts counter-protestors, volunteers who wave colorful umbrellas and try to shepherd patients safely into the clinic.

    A 65-year-old woman who did not want to give her name says she initially volunteered in 1973 when America was in shock after the landmark Roe vs. Wade ruling legalized abortion across the United States.

    She says she was exasperated when she realized she would have to begin doing it again in 2017, when Trump became president.

    "I thought we took care of this," she said.



    https://www.rawstory.com/abortion-in-arizona-women-race-against-the-clock-of-an-archaic-law/
     
  17. stumbler

    stumbler Porn Star

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2006
    Messages:
    106,324
    Woman you have no rights. If I stick my dick in you and you get pregnant your body belongs to me.



    [​IMG]
    Texas man wants court order to investigate woman’s out-of-state abortion
    Alessandra Freitas and Tierney Sneed, CNN
    Sun, May 5, 2024 at 10:28 AM MDT·5 min read
    533


    [​IMG]
    Brandon Bell/Getty Images
    A Texas man is seeking a court order so he can depose a woman he was dating who traveled to Colorado to get an abortion, in a case that may have ramifications in the ongoing legal battles over abortion rights.

    Collin Davis, a resident of Brazos County, filed a legal petition in March stating that on February 20 — the day after he learned the woman intended to obtain the abortion — he retained an attorney, who sent the woman a letter requesting that she preserve all records related to her plans to terminate the pregnancy.

    According to the petition, the letter warned that he “would pursue wrongful-death claims against anyone involved in the killing of his unborn child.”


    Davis argues that the deposition is necessary to determine whether there was a violation of the Texas wrongful-death statute, which the petition references alongside a Texas civil code that includes among those defined as individuals “an unborn child at every stage of gestation from fertilization until birth.” His petition additionally points to Texas’ civil enforcement six-week abortion ban, known as SB 8.

    The woman filed a petition for court records to be sealed so her identity would remain anonymous, her attorney told CNN. She began dating Davis in November 2023 and found out that she was pregnant in January, according to the petition.

    The case, which was reported on by The Washington Post on Friday, is being cited by abortion rights supporters who fear that anti-abortion advocates will use — or at least threaten to use — strict abortion laws to target abortions obtained even in states where the procedure is legal. Texas’ law, passed in 2021, targets doctors and those involved in facilitating abortions, not the women who undergo the procedure themselves, but opponents say that legal uncertainty about restrictions in a post-Roe America has the intended consequence of intimidating women.

    Davis is seeking the deposition to obtain information about those involved in the abortion, including the identity of the doctor who performed the procedure in Colorado, and he considers filing a lawsuit against all of them, according to the court filings.

    Davis is being represented by Jonathan Mitchell, a well-known lawyer and abortion rights opponent who also represented former President Donald Trump in his Colorado ballot case.

    Mitchell helped craft SB 8, also known as the Texas Heartbeat Act, which uses a novel civil enforcement mechanism to prohibit abortions after fetal cardiac activity is detected, a point usually around six weeks into a pregnancy. Davis cited the law in his petition for the deposition.

    CNN has reached out to Davis for comment.

    Mitchell said in a statement, “Fathers of aborted fetuses can sue for wrongful death in states with abortion bans, even if the abortion occurs out-of-state. They can sue anyone who paid for the abortion, anyone who aided or abetted the travel, and anyone involved in the manufacture or distribution of abortion drugs.”

    Critics decry legal maneuvers
    The case is seen by some abortion rights advocates as an example of the new legal landscape facing women who wish to obtain an abortion, even by legal means.

    “We don’t think there is a basis (for a lawsuit),” Marc Hearron, an attorney at the Center for Reproductive Rights, which is representing the woman, told CNN. “It is perfectly legal to leave Texas or any state and go get an abortion in a state where it is legal. And it is perfectly legal to help someone or be involved in someone going out of state and obtaining an abortion where it is allowed by law.”

    Nancy Northup, president & CEO of the Center for Reproductive Rights, said the Supreme Court’s 2022 decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization to overturn Roe v. Wade “opened the door to this kind of frightening and unacceptable fearmongering and harassment by one citizen against another.”

    Mitchell has spearheaded other legal efforts in the wake of Texas’ abortion law. Last June, he represented a man who filed a wrongful death lawsuit against three friends of his ex-wife who allegedly assisted her in terminating her pregnancy with abortion medication, in an early legal test of the reach of wrongful death statutes in the wake of Roe’s reversal. That case has not yet been resolved.

    It’s unclear whether Davis’ petition could lead to a lawsuit against the woman, said Drexel University Law Professor David Cohen.

    “I definitely don’t think there is a basis for this,” he said. “But we have no confidence to know exactly what the Texas courts will say anymore, at any level.”

    Other Republican-led states have sought to pressure women against seeking abortions in other states, particularly minors. Idaho’s legislature last year passed a bill — later blocked by a judge over constitutionality concerns — that would prohibit adults from helping minors cross state lines to get an abortion without parental permission. Meanwhile, Tennessee’s legislature is advancing a law that would similarly criminalize so-called “abortion trafficking” for minors in the state.

    “This is all part of a scare campaign to make people afraid that if they go out of state and get an abortion, that they or their loved ones might be sued,” Hearron said. “We really want to emphasize that people should not be intimidated.”

    Temple University Beasley School of Law Dean Rachel Rebouché called Davis’ legal maneuver “bizarre and concerning” but said it was not “surprising.”

    “I think that we’ll see much more of this in the years to come, so long as Dobbs is in the books. And, frankly, this is exactly the type of example we should point to when we talk about when the Supreme Court should overturn Dobbs,” Rebouché told CNN.


    https://www.yahoo.com/news/texas-man-wants-court-order-162842834.html
     
  18. stumbler

    stumbler Porn Star

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2006
    Messages:
    106,324
    Missouri coalition delivers signatures to get abortion rights on November ballot

    Jessica Corbett, Common Dreams
    May 3, 2024 2:11PM ET









    Missouri currently has one of the strictest abortion bans in the United States, but a coalition behind a potential ballot measure is hoping to change that—and on Friday, it made major progress toward expanding reproductive freedom in the state.

    Ahead of a Sunday deadline, Missourians for Constitutional Freedom submitted 380,159 signatures to the Missouri Secretary of State's office, which must now certify them. The signatures were collected in just three months and are over double the number needed to get the proposed amendment on the November ballot.

    "Today, we turned in boxes filled with hopes and dreams of bodily autonomy," declared Tori Schafer, an ACLU attorney and coalition spokesperson, in a statement. "Our message is simple and clear: We want to make decisions about our bodies free from political interference."

    A so-called "trigger law" that took effect after the U.S. Supreme Court reversedRoe v. Wade two years ago prohibits abortion care in Missouri unless the health or life of the pregnant person is at risk. There are no exceptions for rape or incest, and doctors who violate the ban could face up to 15 years behind bars.

    The proposed amendment would broadly safeguard reproductive freedom in the state, protecting not only abortion care before fetal viability but also birth control, respectful birthing conditions, and miscarriage, prenatal, and postpartum care.

    "Hundreds of thousands of Missourians are now having conversations about abortion and reproductive freedom; some are sharing their own abortion stories for the very first time; and all are ready to do whatever it takes to win at the ballot box this year," said Mallory Schwarz, executive director of Abortion Action Missouri and another coalition spokesperson. "Together, we are going to end Missouri's abortion ban."

    Dr. Iman Alsaden, chief medical officer for Planned Parenthood Great Plains and adviser to the coalition, called Friday "a monumental day for Missouri and for my patients."

    "The success of this campaign sends a clear message: Missourians trust patients to make the healthcare decisions that are best for their health and well-being," Alsaden said. "Anti-abortion politicians take note: My patients' lives are not yours to control."

    Missouri is one of several states—including Arizona, Florida, and Montana—where supporters of reproductive freedom are working to pass abortion rights ballot initiatives this cycle. As the divided Congress has failed to codify Roe since the Supreme Court's 2022 decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, ballot measures have been an increasingly popular strategy.

    Kelly Hall, executive director of the Fairness Project, which has backed various abortion rights ballot initiatives across the country over the past few years, welcomed the successful signature collection campaign in Missouri on Friday.

    "Missourians today are living under an extremely cruel abortion ban, enacted by politicians who are profoundly out of touch with their voters," Hall said. "Missourians deserve better—they should be able to make their own healthcare decisions without government interference."

    "This milestone for the Missourians for Constitutional Freedom campaign means that voters are one step closer to being able to use the ballot measure process to secure their rights this November," she added, "and we are excited to be standing with them in that fight."


    https://www.rawstory.com/missouri-c...es-to-get-abortion-rights-on-november-ballot/
     
    1. shootersa
      Excellent.
      As it should be.
      As the court said it should be.
       
      shootersa, May 6, 2024
      mstrman and sirius1902 like this.
  19. latecomer91364

    latecomer91364 Easily Distracte

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2017
    Messages:
    51,927
    It's just sad when the only actual issue the Dems have in 2024 is the right to kill unborn babies with no restrictions. They have nothing else - all the rest is hysterical 'Trump is Hitler!' 'Trump will kill people!' Trump will end elections!' Trump is the END OF DEMOCRACY!!!!'
    This woman is the best spokesperson for the Leftfucks:

    [​IMG]

    This is your Dem party.
     
    • Like Like x 2
    • Agree Agree x 1
  20. stumbler

    stumbler Porn Star

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2006
    Messages:
    106,324
    Women you have no rights. You are breeding stock.

    [​IMG]
    Federal judge blasts threat by Alabama to prosecute groups aiding out-of-state abortions
    John Fritze, CNN
    Tue, May 7, 2024 at 6:44 AM MDT·4 min read
    916


    [​IMG]





    A federal judge smacked down a series of threats by Alabama’s Republican attorney general to prosecute groups that help women obtain out-of-state abortions, wading into a debate over access to the procedure that has lingered since the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade two years ago.

    The plaintiffs, including a group called the Yellowhammer Fund that helps women obtain out-of-state abortions, sued Alabama Attorney General leaving the page." data-wf-tooltip-position="bottom" data-wf-reset-every="90">Steve Marshall after he suggested prosecution might be possible for groups that “aid and abet abortions,” including by helping women travel out of state.

    That issue has been closely watched by advocates on both sides of the abortion debate as red states across the country ban or severely limit access to the procedure in the wake of the Supreme Court’s decision to overturn Roe. That has forced many women seeking an abortion in a clinical setting to cross state lines.


    “The right to interstate travel is one of our most fundamental constitutional rights,” US District Judge Myron Thompson wrote in a preliminary ruling late Monday.

    “Alabama can no more restrict people from going to, say, California to engage in what is lawful there than California can restrict people from coming to Alabama to do what is lawful here,” Thompson wrote.

    The suits were brought not by women seeking an out-of-state abortion but rather by groups that intend to help them. Thompson, appointed to the bench by President Jimmy Carter, wrote that a patient’s right to travel was “inextricably bound up” with those groups. Collectively, he wrote, the groups receive as many as 95 inquiries each week asking about the availability of out-of-state abortions.

    “The Constitution protects the right to cross state lines and engage in lawful conduct in other states, including receiving an abortion,” Thomson wrote in a decision that will allow the lawsuit to proceed. “Travel is valuable precisely because it allows us to pursue opportunities available elsewhere.”

    A spokeswoman for Marshall did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

    Even before the Supreme Court overturned Roe in 2022, abortion rights groups warned that some states might attempt to limit out-of-state travel for the procedure. Since the Supreme Court’s decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, nearly two dozen states have banned or heavily limited access to abortion.

    Florida’s six-week abortion ban took effect last week, for instance, cutting off access to the procedure in most of the southern United States. Alabama has banned abortion with no exception for rape or incest.

    “I think we will see statements like these increase as attorneys general and other state actors try to extend their own abortion politics and policies across state lines,” said Temple University Beasley School of Law Dean Rachel Rebouché. “This is the world Dobbs created – one of intense interstate conflict.”

    The Supreme Court’s majority opinion in Dobbs didn’t deal with out-of-state travel.
    But Justice Brett Kavanaugh, a conservative who joined the court’s 5-4 majority to overturn Roe, wrote separately to suggest that the question wasn’t an “especially difficult” one to decide.

    “As I see it, some of the other abortion-related legal questions raised by today’s decision are not especially difficult as a constitutional matter,” Kavanaugh wrote. “For example, may a state bar a resident of that State from traveling to another state to obtain an abortion? In my view, the answer is no based on the constitutional right to interstate travel.”

    Access to abortion medication, another option for women in states that ban the procedure, is also facing a legal challenge. The Supreme Court this year is considering a suit by conservative doctors and advocates who say the Food and Drug Administration overstepped its authority by expanding access to the abortion pill mifepristone.

    The Alabama groups were represented by the American Civil Liberties Union.

    The decision “brings us one step closer to ensuring that healthcare providers can fulfill their ethical duties to their patients and to establishing that pregnant Alabamians can access comprehensive information about their legal healthcare options.,” said Alison Mollman, legal director of the ACLU of Alabama.


    https://www.yahoo.com/news/federal-judge-blasts-threat-alabama-112135650.html